Tag Archives: cba

Sorry for the Inconvenience

First of all, my apologies for obsessing on this just a little bit, but I’m really bugged by the NFLP.ORG site formally known as the NFLPA.ORG , saying this.

To me, this is not an inconvenience.

Sorry for the inconvenience applies to . . .

Continue reading Sorry for the Inconvenience

This just about says it all

If you try to go to the nflpa.org site you get the dreaded 404 football not found message.

I thru in the pic just for good measure.

Talk about Fumbled Returns . . .

Thanks a lot guys.

Doting on Doty

To:  The Honorable Judge Doty

On behalf of NFL Football Fans everywhere, I wish to personally thank you for becoming the most influential person in the NFL.

I realize that this was probably like hitting the legal easy button but still, it needed to be done.

You see, as a parent I recognized the behavior instantly.

You have a bunch of children fighting and arguing over a case of 9 Billion Matchbox Cars and the whole scene soon escalates, or degrades, into a very dangerous situation with each kid hording the key favorite cars for their own and not sharing with the others, calling each other nasty names.  Never mind that there is still nearly a whole case of perfectly good cars yet to be had.  Each kid feels they can hold out with the stash they’ve got in hand.  This behavior puts the entire game at risk.

So as a fair and concerned parent, we take the whole case of 9 Billion away and hold them out of reach until they (the kids) learn to get along and come to an agreement on how to share the cars, get along nicely and play the game according a set of rules all can live with.

And, if they continue to fight and argue or even as some of the owners are now threating to do. . .  “leave and find another parent (Judge) who is nicer” You say fine! And hold each of them accountable and send them to their rooms and make them pay even more in damages to those who are willing to play along and work things out and say “see you at the dinner (negotiating) table”.

So, thank you for imposing this valuable lesson, opportunity to learn, on the children of the NFL.

It’s a lesson every parent tries to teach, but alas, some children never learn.

Let’s all hope it works out for everyone’s benefit.  Owners, Players, and Fans.

Thank you.

Source of inspiration:  Sports illustrated article and the last paragraphs of Judge Doty’s ruling.

“The court orders that a hearing be held concerning relief to be granted to the Players arising from the NFL’s breach of the agreement,” Doty ruled. “The hearing shall consider the award of both money damages and equitable relief, including injunction.”

That means Doty could hold the broadcast revenue in escrow for a full year, or until there’s an agreement between the two sides. That would keep owners with annual debt-service payments of $50 million or more on their stadiums — Daniel Snyder in Washington and Bob McNair in Houston are two owners with major mortgages on their facilities — from accessing the TV money to pay for expenses during any prolonged labor dispute. How much could Doty sanction the owners? What could the damages be? No one knows, but he’s issued so many rulings the owners loathe that they obviously are scared of finding out. And even though they could appeal Doty’s ruling on damages to a three-judge Eighth Circuit panel, there’s no guarantee that panel would be any friendlier to them than a widely respected jurist like Doty.

Doing without?

Ok, so I’ve noticed two things.

Even with the very real chance of no football next year, every season ticket holder has been required to pay in advance for tickets.  This will make sure that if there is a next season, you will be in the same spot you were last year.

And. . .

With the very real chance of a government shutdown, and the cancellation of essential services, you are still required to pay your taxes.  Because if you don’t, you may go to jail.  Paying taxes will make sure that you remain exactly where you have been.  In debt to Uncle Sam.

It seems both the NFL and the United States Government consider the collection of our money essential.

Are Collective Bargaining Agreements really necessary?

With lockouts and shutdowns looming in our faces next week and fiscal debates and strikes hitting all the headlines, I am beginning to wonder if CBA’s and Unions are really necessary and useful anymore.

Don’t get me wrong, I am all for worker rights and such but much of the core values behind forming Unions eons ago have been incorporated into federal and state guidelines for businesses.

After all, I am not part of a union but I have what I consider a good job with good benefits and lots of resources available to me as an employee and citizen.

Also, with fiscal responsibility becoming more and more forefront in everyone’s minds ( AKA Wisconsin ), many local governments and organizations are looking at the possibility of consolidating services across boundaries in an effort to reduce costs and become more efficient by reducing duplication of jobs, roles and services.

Regarding the NFL and the Players Union; would it be so bad to have the NFL act like any other publicly traded company? And would it really hurt the players to be employees and stock holders of said company?

I bet the owners would get at least as much, if not more, money than they do now. The players and the public would have disclosure, and agents could still negotiate as they do now for contracts and salaries.

I’m just curious as to what everyone’s opinions are, or am I alone in thinking like this and just need to get with the program?

Is it a lock?

I was working on a post about the possibilities regarding the NFL CBA negotiations and the possible outcomes.

But, as usual, somebody else wrote about it.  And, much better than I could ever possibly hope to.

Gabriel Feldman is a writer at the Huffington Post and he also happens to be a Law Professor in Sports Law at Tulane University.

If you read through his article, you will be able to put together a potential script for how this is all going to play out.

I especially liked that part about the NFL making a final and best offer and putting the blame on the players who have the “let us play” campaign.

Yes, there is a lot of money at stake here, but so are a lot of reputations and images as well.

My prediction:  We will not see any significant events until the 11th hour and hope that they make something happen for the 4th.  But if the two sides do not, then my fear is that they will hash something out later in the year to “save” the season, which of course – in my opinion, it will be too late.

But, like the sports fans we are, will watch anyway.

So, without further delay, here is Gabriel’s article . . .

NFL Lockout: The Legal Issues Behind the NFL-CBA Negotiations

The State of the Union

Featuring the NFLPA and NFL Owners Association.

Obama’s State of the Union Address and the State of the NFL, Owners and Players Union all have a lot in common.

Namely . . .

Hope: 

Obama is full of it and he wants us to be too.  He actually means well, works hard and is calling for everyone to work together to turn things around and continue on the road to recovery.

The NFL owners, players and fans hope there is a 2011 season and in reality the owners and players need to come together and get this whole CBA thing worked out.

Jobs:

Obama says we need to create more and that the landscape has changed.

The NFL says the players need to do more and that there should be 18 game seasons.

The players want to keep theirs and say that a lock out will cost some markets $160 million in lost economic jobs.

The fans just want everybody to do theirs.

Money

Everybody wants more.

The owners say they are no longer profitable, are losing money and the rookie salaries are out of control.

The players say they are not as profitable as the current agreement says they are and that there are hidden costs to their profession.

The fans don’t want to lose out on the chance to bet on games and win fantasy football pools, oh and are tired of everyone else complaining they don’t have enough.

Health Care

The owners say they are concerned about the players well being and safety

The players say sacrifice their bodies for the job and that the cost(s) stay with them and only get worse after their careers are over and often are unable to get proper care.

The fans don’t want the game to become nothing more than flag football or two hand touch.

Transparency and accountability

The players say if you are losing so much money and are no longer profitable, prove it and open up your books.

The owners say “No way”.

The fans say both sides are blowing smoke and need to be held accountable.

First of all, neither side has owned up to the whole truth.

Politifact has proven that the $160 million statement made by the NFLPA is bogus.

A study was made (as best as possible) that the owners are full of it when they say they are no longer profitable under the current agreement.

AND

That the players union is basically right when they say the players are not getting the total percentage of profits as stated in the current agreement.

AND

That strangely enough rookie salaries are not out of control.

The current state of the Union and negotiations is a Stalemate and this benefit nobody!

The two sides have yet to sit down and do any serious negotiations.  In fact just about the only thing that has happened is lots of finger pointing, digging in, getting ready for a lockout, and name calling.

Now for the Fumbled Returns Analysis:

IMHO:

The NFLPA is screwed, has the most to lose, and needs to step up to the plate and earnestly start negotiations.   Of course, this will not really start to happen, at least publicly, until the 11th hour.

The owners really are rich and if there is a lock out, yes they lose out on all the additional revenue from ticket sales and merchandise but they don’t have any salaries to pay out either.  Plus, they have a signed sealed and delivered TV contract in place that guarantees them millions upon millions over the next several years.

And as you may have heard, the union has the desertification trick up their sleeve but this is a double edge sword.

If the NFLPA were to decertify, it would, in effect, operate as a trade organization but cease to be a union. If the league then tried to lock out players, the NFLPA could sue the NFL under U.S. antitrust laws and contend the league was conducting a group boycott, which is illegal. It could not sue the NFL if it remained a union with collective-bargaining authority for its members, under the labor exemption to antitrust laws

Although there are advantages to the union decertifying, namely allowing it to gain access to the antitrust laws, there are disadvantages as well. Not only would the NFLPA not be able to collectively bargain for its members, it could not bring grievances for them and could not compel them to pay dues or control their marketing rights. When the union decertified in 1989, the league and the NFLPA, acting as a trade association, competed with each other for players’ marketing and licensing rights.

If a lock out occurs, The Owners will come out looking as the bad guys.

The players will be hurting financially.

And the fans will be pissed.

So, what to do?

In the spirit of U.S Activism, and political / constitutional rights, I urged every fan to at the very least voice their opinion to the NFL, NFLPA, and heck even congress.  They tend to stay out of stuff like this but hey, in tough economic times, who knows, it just might become a point of interest for them politically.

There are also various sites and petitions you can sign up with such as savenextseason.com  and the sports fan coalition (which btw is heavily funded by media companies like cable and Verizon).

To borrow a state of the union phrase from Obama, “we will move forward together”.